'연설'에 해당되는 글 4건

  1. 2009/06/05 Obama’s Speech in Cairo
  2. 2009/01/28 오바마 취임 연설(원문) (3)
  3. 2007/11/06 이명박은 피하고,정동영은 기다리고 (6)
  4. 2007/11/05 정동영,삼성 사태 오락가락? (12)
2009/06/05 17:33

Obama’s Speech in Cairo

The following is a text of President Obama's prepared remarks to the Muslim world, delivered on June 4, 2009, as released by the White House.


I am honored to be in the timeless city of Cairo, and to be hosted by two remarkable institutions. For over a thousand years, Al-Azhar has stood as a beacon of Islamic learning, and for over a century, Cairo University has been a source of Egypt's advancement. Together, you represent the harmony between tradition and progress. I am grateful for your hospitality, and the hospitality of the people of Egypt. I am also proud to carry with me the goodwill of the American people, and a greeting of peace from Muslim communities in my country: assalaamu alaykum.

We meet at a time of tension between the United States and Muslims around the world – tension rooted in historical forces that go beyond any current policy debate. The relationship between Islam and the West includes centuries of co-existence and cooperation, but also conflict and religious wars. More recently, tension has been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims, and a Cold War in which Muslim-majority countries were too often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations. Moreover, the sweeping change brought by modernity and globalization led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to the traditions of Islam.

Violent extremists have exploited these tensions in a small but potent minority of Muslims. The attacks of September 11th, 2001 and the continued efforts of these extremists to engage in violence against civilians has led some in my country to view Islam as inevitably hostile not only to America and Western countries, but also to human rights. This has bred more fear and mistrust.

So long as our relationship is defined by our differences, we will empower those who sow hatred rather than peace, and who promote conflict rather than the cooperation that can help all of our people achieve justice and prosperity. This cycle of suspicion and discord must end.

I have come here to seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world; one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect; and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive, and need not be in competition. Instead, they overlap, and share common principles – principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.

I do so recognizing that change cannot happen overnight. No single speech can eradicate years of mistrust, nor can I answer in the time that I have all the complex questions that brought us to this point. But I am convinced that in order to move forward, we must say openly the things we hold in our hearts, and that too often are said only behind closed doors. There must be a sustained effort to listen to each other; to learn from each other; to respect one another; and to seek common ground. As the Holy Koran tells us, "Be conscious of God and speak always the truth." That is what I will try to do – to speak the truth as best I can, humbled by the task before us, and firm in my belief that the interests we share as human beings are far more powerful than the forces that drive us apart.

Part of this conviction is rooted in my own experience. I am a Christian, but my father came from a Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims. As a boy, I spent several years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn and the fall of dusk. As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith.

As a student of history, I also know civilization's debt to Islam. It was Islam – at places like Al-Azhar University – that carried the light of learning through so many centuries, paving the way for Europe's Renaissance and Enlightenment. It was innovation in Muslim communities that developed the order of algebra; our magnetic compass and tools of navigation; our mastery of pens and printing; our understanding of how disease spreads and how it can be healed. Islamic culture has given us majestic arches and soaring spires; timeless poetry and cherished music; elegant calligraphy and places of peaceful contemplation. And throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.

I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of America's story. The first nation to recognize my country was Morocco. In signing the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796, our second President John Adams wrote, "The United States has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Muslims." And since our founding, American Muslims have enriched the United States. They have fought in our wars, served in government, stood for civil rights, started businesses, taught at our Universities, excelled in our sports arenas, won Nobel Prizes, built our tallest building, and lit the Olympic Torch. And when the first Muslim-American was recently elected to Congress, he took the oath to defend our Constitution using the same Holy Koran that one of our Founding Fathers – Thomas Jefferson – kept in his personal library.

So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn't. And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.

But that same principle must apply to Muslim perceptions of America. Just as Muslims do not fit a crude stereotype, America is not the crude stereotype of a self-interested empire. The United States has been one of the greatest sources of progress that the world has ever known. We were born out of revolution against an empire. We were founded upon the ideal that all are created equal, and we have shed blood and struggled for centuries to give meaning to those words – within our borders, and around the world. We are shaped by every culture, drawn from every end of the Earth, and dedicated to a simple concept: E pluribus unum: "Out of many, one."

Much has been made of the fact that an African-American with the name Barack Hussein Obama could be elected President. But my personal story is not so unique. The dream of opportunity for all people has not come true for everyone in America, but its promise exists for all who come to our shores – that includes nearly seven million American Muslims in our country today who enjoy incomes and education that are higher than average.

Moreover, freedom in America is indivisible from the freedom to practice one's religion. That is why there is a mosque in every state of our union, and over 1,200 mosques within our borders. That is why the U.S. government has gone to court to protect the right of women and girls to wear the hijab, and to punish those who would deny it.

So let there be no doubt: Islam is a part of America. And I believe that America holds within her the truth that regardless of race, religion, or station in life, all of us share common aspirations – to live in peace and security; to get an education and to work with dignity; to love our families, our communities, and our God. These things we share. This is the hope of all humanity.

Of course, recognizing our common humanity is only the beginning of our task. Words alone cannot meet the needs of our people. These needs will be met only if we act boldly in the years ahead; and if we understand that the challenges we face are shared, and our failure to meet them will hurt us all.

For we have learned from recent experience that when a financial system weakens in one country, prosperity is hurt everywhere. When a new flu infects one human being, all are at risk. When one nation pursues a nuclear weapon, the risk of nuclear attack rises for all nations. When violent extremists operate in one stretch of mountains, people are endangered across an ocean. And when innocents in Bosnia and Darfur are slaughtered, that is a stain on our collective conscience. That is what it means to share this world in the 21st century. That is the responsibility we have to one another as human beings.

This is a difficult responsibility to embrace. For human history has often been a record of nations and tribes subjugating one another to serve their own interests. Yet in this new age, such attitudes are self-defeating. Given our interdependence, any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail. So whatever we think of the past, we must not be prisoners of it. Our problems must be dealt with through partnership; progress must be shared.

That does not mean we should ignore sources of tension. Indeed, it suggests the opposite: we must face these tensions squarely. And so in that spirit, let me speak as clearly and plainly as I can about some specific issues that I believe we must finally confront together.

The first issue that we have to confront is violent extremism in all of its forms.

In Ankara, I made clear that America is not – and never will be – at war with Islam. We will, however, relentlessly confront violent extremists who pose a grave threat to our security. Because we reject the same thing that people of all faiths reject: the killing of innocent men, women, and children. And it is my first duty as President to protect the American people.

The situation in Afghanistan demonstrates America's goals, and our need to work together. Over seven years ago, the United States pursued al Qaeda and the Taliban with broad international support. We did not go by choice, we went because of necessity. I am aware that some question or justify the events of 9/11. But let us be clear: al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day. The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet Al Qaeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach. These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with.

Make no mistake: we do not want to keep our troops in Afghanistan. We seek no military bases there. It is agonizing for America to lose our young men and women. It is costly and politically difficult to continue this conflict. We would gladly bring every single one of our troops home if we could be confident that there were not violent extremists in Afghanistan and Pakistan determined to kill as many Americans as they possibly can. But that is not yet the case.

That's why we're partnering with a coalition of forty-six countries. And despite the costs involved, America's commitment will not weaken. Indeed, none of us should tolerate these extremists. They have killed in many countries. They have killed people of different faiths – more than any other, they have killed Muslims. Their actions are irreconcilable with the rights of human beings, the progress of nations, and with Islam. The Holy Koran teaches that whoever kills an innocent, it is as if he has killed all mankind; and whoever saves a person, it is as if he has saved all mankind. The enduring faith of over a billion people is so much bigger than the narrow hatred of a few. Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism – it is an important part of promoting peace.

We also know that military power alone is not going to solve the problems in Afghanistan and Pakistan. That is why we plan to invest $1.5 billion each year over the next five years to partner with Pakistanis to build schools and hospitals, roads and businesses, and hundreds of millions to help those who have been displaced. And that is why we are providing more than $2.8 billion to help Afghans develop their economy and deliver services that people depend upon.

Let me also address the issue of Iraq. Unlike Afghanistan, Iraq was a war of choice that provoked strong differences in my country and around the world. Although I believe that the Iraqi people are ultimately better off without the tyranny of Saddam Hussein, I also believe that events in Iraq have reminded America of the need to use diplomacy and build international consensus to resolve our problems whenever possible. Indeed, we can recall the words of Thomas Jefferson, who said: "I hope that our wisdom will grow with our power, and teach us that the less we use our power the greater it will be."

Today, America has a dual responsibility: to help Iraq forge a better future – and to leave Iraq to Iraqis. I have made it clear to the Iraqi people that we pursue no bases, and no claim on their territory or resources. Iraq's sovereignty is its own. That is why I ordered the removal of our combat brigades by next August. That is why we will honor our agreement with Iraq's democratically-elected government to remove combat troops from Iraqi cities by July, and to remove all our troops from Iraq by 2012. We will help Iraq train its Security Forces and develop its economy. But we will support a secure and united Iraq as a partner, and never as a patron.

And finally, just as America can never tolerate violence by extremists, we must never alter our principles. 9/11 was an enormous trauma to our country. The fear and anger that it provoked was understandable, but in some cases, it led us to act contrary to our ideals. We are taking concrete actions to change course. I have unequivocally prohibited the use of torture by the United States, and I have ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed by early next year.

So America will defend itself respectful of the sovereignty of nations and the rule of law. And we will do so in partnership with Muslim communities which are also threatened. The sooner the extremists are isolated and unwelcome in Muslim communities, the sooner we will all be safer.

The second major source of tension that we need to discuss is the situation between Israelis, Palestinians and the Arab world.

America's strong bonds with Israel are well known. This bond is unbreakable. It is based upon cultural and historical ties, and the recognition that the aspiration for a Jewish homeland is rooted in a tragic history that cannot be denied.

Around the world, the Jewish people were persecuted for centuries, and anti-Semitism in Europe culminated in an unprecedented Holocaust. Tomorrow, I will visit Buchenwald, which was part of a network of camps where Jews were enslaved, tortured, shot and gassed to death by the Third Reich. Six million Jews were killed – more than the entire Jewish population of Israel today. Denying that fact is baseless, ignorant, and hateful. Threatening Israel with destruction – or repeating vile stereotypes about Jews – is deeply wrong, and only serves to evoke in the minds of Israelis this most painful of memories while preventing the peace that the people of this region deserve.

On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the Palestinian people – Muslims and Christians – have suffered in pursuit of a homeland. For more than sixty years they have endured the pain of dislocation. Many wait in refugee camps in the West Bank, Gaza, and neighboring lands for a life of peace and security that they have never been able to lead. They endure the daily humiliations – large and small – that come with occupation. So let there be no doubt: the situation for the Palestinian people is intolerable. America will not turn our backs on the legitimate Palestinian aspiration for dignity, opportunity, and a state of their own.

For decades, there has been a stalemate: two peoples with legitimate aspirations, each with a painful history that makes compromise elusive. It is easy to point fingers – for Palestinians to point to the displacement brought by Israel's founding, and for Israelis to point to the constant hostility and attacks throughout its history from within its borders as well as beyond. But if we see this conflict only from one side or the other, then we will be blind to the truth: the only resolution is for the aspirations of both sides to be met through two states, where Israelis and Palestinians each live in peace and security.

That is in Israel's interest, Palestine's interest, America's interest, and the world's interest. That is why I intend to personally pursue this outcome with all the patience that the task requires. The obligations that the parties have agreed to under the Road Map are clear. For peace to come, it is time for them – and all of us – to live up to our responsibilities.

Palestinians must abandon violence. Resistance through violence and killing is wrong and does not succeed. For centuries, black people in America suffered the lash of the whip as slaves and the humiliation of segregation. But it was not violence that won full and equal rights. It was a peaceful and determined insistence upon the ideals at the center of America's founding. This same story can be told by people from South Africa to South Asia; from Eastern Europe to Indonesia. It's a story with a simple truth: that violence is a dead end. It is a sign of neither courage nor power to shoot rockets at sleeping children, or to blow up old women on a bus. That is not how moral authority is claimed; that is how it is surrendered.

Now is the time for Palestinians to focus on what they can build. The Palestinian Authority must develop its capacity to govern, with institutions that serve the needs of its people. Hamas does have support among some Palestinians, but they also have responsibilities. To play a role in fulfilling Palestinian aspirations, and to unify the Palestinian people, Hamas must put an end to violence, recognize past agreements, and recognize Israel's right to exist.

At the same time, Israelis must acknowledge that just as Israel's right to exist cannot be denied, neither can Palestine's. The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements. This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace. It is time for these settlements to stop.

Israel must also live up to its obligations to ensure that Palestinians can live, and work, and develop their society. And just as it devastates Palestinian families, the continuing humanitarian crisis in Gaza does not serve Israel's security; neither does the continuing lack of opportunity in the West Bank. Progress in the daily lives of the Palestinian people must be part of a road to peace, and Israel must take concrete steps to enable such progress.

Finally, the Arab States must recognize that the Arab Peace Initiative was an important beginning, but not the end of their responsibilities. The Arab-Israeli conflict should no longer be used to distract the people of Arab nations from other problems. Instead, it must be a cause for action to help the Palestinian people develop the institutions that will sustain their state; to recognize Israel's legitimacy; and to choose progress over a self-defeating focus on the past.

America will align our policies with those who pursue peace, and say in public what we say in private to Israelis and Palestinians and Arabs. We cannot impose peace. But privately, many Muslims recognize that Israel will not go away. Likewise, many Israelis recognize the need for a Palestinian state. It is time for us to act on what everyone knows to be true.

Too many tears have flowed. Too much blood has been shed. All of us have a responsibility to work for the day when the mothers of Israelis and Palestinians can see their children grow up without fear; when the Holy Land of three great faiths is the place of peace that God intended it to be; when Jerusalem is a secure and lasting home for Jews and Christians and Muslims, and a place for all of the children of Abraham to mingle peacefully together as in the story of Isra, when Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed (peace be upon them) joined in prayer.

The third source of tension is our shared interest in the rights and responsibilities of nations on nuclear weapons.

This issue has been a source of tension between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran. For many years, Iran has defined itself in part by its opposition to my country, and there is indeed a tumultuous history between us. In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically-elected Iranian government. Since the Islamic Revolution, Iran has played a role in acts of hostage-taking and violence against U.S. troops and civilians. This history is well known. Rather than remain trapped in the past, I have made it clear to Iran's leaders and people that my country is prepared to move forward. The question, now, is not what Iran is against, but rather what future it wants to build.

It will be hard to overcome decades of mistrust, but we will proceed with courage, rectitude and resolve. There will be many issues to discuss between our two countries, and we are willing to move forward without preconditions on the basis of mutual respect. But it is clear to all concerned that when it comes to nuclear weapons, we have reached a decisive point. This is not simply about America's interests. It is about preventing a nuclear arms race in the Middle East that could lead this region and the world down a hugely dangerous path.

I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nation should pick and choose which nations hold nuclear weapons. That is why I strongly reaffirmed America's commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons. And any nation – including Iran – should have the right to access peaceful nuclear power if it complies with its responsibilities under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That commitment is at the core of the Treaty, and it must be kept for all who fully abide by it. And I am hopeful that all countries in the region can share in this goal.

The fourth issue that I will address is democracy.

I know there has been controversy about the promotion of democracy in recent years, and much of this controversy is connected to the war in Iraq. So let me be clear: no system of government can or should be imposed upon one nation by any other.

That does not lessen my commitment, however, to governments that reflect the will of the people. Each nation gives life to this principle in its own way, grounded in the traditions of its own people. America does not presume to know what is best for everyone, just as we would not presume to pick the outcome of a peaceful election. But I do have an unyielding belief that all people yearn for certain things: the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed; confidence in the rule of law and the equal administration of justice; government that is transparent and doesn't steal from the people; the freedom to live as you choose. Those are not just American ideas, they are human rights, and that is why we will support them everywhere.

There is no straight line to realize this promise. But this much is clear: governments that protect these rights are ultimately more stable, successful and secure. Suppressing ideas never succeeds in making them go away. America respects the right of all peaceful and law-abiding voices to be heard around the world, even if we disagree with them. And we will welcome all elected, peaceful governments – provided they govern with respect for all their people.

This last point is important because there are some who advocate for democracy only when they are out of power; once in power, they are ruthless in suppressing the rights of others. No matter where it takes hold, government of the people and by the people sets a single standard for all who hold power: you must maintain your power through consent, not coercion; you must respect the rights of minorities, and participate with a spirit of tolerance and compromise; you must place the interests of your people and the legitimate workings of the political process above your party. Without these ingredients, elections alone do not make true democracy.

The fifth issue that we must address together is religious freedom.

Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. We see it in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba during the Inquisition. I saw it firsthand as a child in Indonesia, where devout Christians worshiped freely in an overwhelmingly Muslim country. That is the spirit we need today. People in every country should be free to choose and live their faith based upon the persuasion of the mind, heart, and soul. This tolerance is essential for religion to thrive, but it is being challenged in many different ways.

Among some Muslims, there is a disturbing tendency to measure one's own faith by the rejection of another's. The richness of religious diversity must be upheld – whether it is for Maronites in Lebanon or the Copts in Egypt. And fault lines must be closed among Muslims as well, as the divisions between Sunni and Shia have led to tragic violence, particularly in Iraq.

Freedom of religion is central to the ability of peoples to live together. We must always examine the ways in which we protect it. For instance, in the United States, rules on charitable giving have made it harder for Muslims to fulfill their religious obligation. That is why I am committed to working with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfill zakat.

Likewise, it is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit – for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear. We cannot disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretence of liberalism.

Indeed, faith should bring us together. That is why we are forging service projects in America that bring together Christians, Muslims, and Jews. That is why we welcome efforts like Saudi Arabian King Abdullah's Interfaith dialogue and Turkey's leadership in the Alliance of Civilizations. Around the world, we can turn dialogue into Interfaith service, so bridges between peoples lead to action – whether it is combating malaria in Africa, or providing relief after a natural disaster.

The sixth issue that I want to address is women's rights.

I know there is debate about this issue. I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal, but I do believe that a woman who is denied an education is denied equality. And it is no coincidence that countries where women are well-educated are far more likely to be prosperous.

Now let me be clear: issues of women's equality are by no means simply an issue for Islam. In Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Indonesia, we have seen Muslim-majority countries elect a woman to lead. Meanwhile, the struggle for women's equality continues in many aspects of American life, and in countries around the world.

Our daughters can contribute just as much to society as our sons, and our common prosperity will be advanced by allowing all humanity – men and women – to reach their full potential. I do not believe that women must make the same choices as men in order to be equal, and I respect those women who choose to live their lives in traditional roles. But it should be their choice. That is why the United States will partner with any Muslim-majority country to support expanded literacy for girls, and to help young women pursue employment through micro-financing that helps people live their dreams.

Finally, I want to discuss economic development and opportunity.

I know that for many, the face of globalization is contradictory. The Internet and television can bring knowledge and information, but also offensive sexuality and mindless violence. Trade can bring new wealth and opportunities, but also huge disruptions and changing communities. In all nations – including my own – this change can bring fear. Fear that because of modernity we will lose of control over our economic choices, our politics, and most importantly our identities – those things we most cherish about our communities, our families, our traditions, and our faith.

But I also know that human progress cannot be denied. There need not be contradiction between development and tradition. Countries like Japan and South Korea grew their economies while maintaining distinct cultures. The same is true for the astonishing progress within Muslim-majority countries from Kuala Lumpur to Dubai. In ancient times and in our times, Muslim communities have been at the forefront of innovation and education.

This is important because no development strategy can be based only upon what comes out of the ground, nor can it be sustained while young people are out of work. Many Gulf States have enjoyed great wealth as a consequence of oil, and some are beginning to focus it on broader development. But all of us must recognize that education and innovation will be the currency of the 21st century, and in too many Muslim communities there remains underinvestment in these areas. I am emphasizing such investments within my country. And while America in the past has focused on oil and gas in this part of the world, we now seek a broader engagement.

On education, we will expand exchange programs, and increase scholarships, like the one that brought my father to America, while encouraging more Americans to study in Muslim communities. And we will match promising Muslim students with internships in America; invest in on-line learning for teachers and children around the world; and create a new online network, so a teenager in Kansas can communicate instantly with a teenager in Cairo.

On economic development, we will create a new corps of business volunteers to partner with counterparts in Muslim-majority countries. And I will host a Summit on Entrepreneurship this year to identify how we can deepen ties between business leaders, foundations and social entrepreneurs in the United States and Muslim communities around the world.

On science and technology, we will launch a new fund to support technological development in Muslim-majority countries, and to help transfer ideas to the marketplace so they can create jobs. We will open centers of scientific excellence in Africa, the Middle East and Southeast Asia, and appoint new Science Envoys to collaborate on programs that develop new sources of energy, create green jobs, digitize records, clean water, and grow new crops. And today I am announcing a new global effort with the Organization of the Islamic Conference to eradicate polio. And we will also expand partnerships with Muslim communities to promote child and maternal health.

All these things must be done in partnership. Americans are ready to join with citizens and governments; community organizations, religious leaders, and businesses in Muslim communities around the world to help our people pursue a better life.

The issues that I have described will not be easy to address. But we have a responsibility to join together on behalf of the world we seek – a world where extremists no longer threaten our people, and American troops have come home; a world where Israelis and Palestinians are each secure in a state of their own, and nuclear energy is used for peaceful purposes; a world where governments serve their citizens, and the rights of all God's children are respected. Those are mutual interests. That is the world we seek. But we can only achieve it together.

I know there are many – Muslim and non-Muslim – who question whether we can forge this new beginning. Some are eager to stoke the flames of division, and to stand in the way of progress. Some suggest that it isn't worth the effort – that we are fated to disagree, and civilizations are doomed to clash. Many more are simply skeptical that real change can occur. There is so much fear, so much mistrust. But if we choose to be bound by the past, we will never move forward. And I want to particularly say this to young people of every faith, in every country – you, more than anyone, have the ability to remake this world.

All of us share this world for but a brief moment in time. The question is whether we spend that time focused on what pushes us apart, or whether we commit ourselves to an effort – a sustained effort – to find common ground, to focus on the future we seek for our children, and to respect the dignity of all human beings.

It is easier to start wars than to end them. It is easier to blame others than to look inward; to see what is different about someone than to find the things we share. But we should choose the right path, not just the easy path. There is also one rule that lies at the heart of every religion – that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. This truth transcends nations and peoples – a belief that isn't new; that isn't black or white or brown; that isn't Christian, or Muslim or Jew. It's a belief that pulsed in the cradle of civilization, and that still beats in the heart of billions. It's a faith in other people, and it's what brought me here today.

We have the power to make the world we seek, but only if we have the courage to make a new beginning, keeping in mind what has been written.

The Holy Koran tells us, "O mankind! We have created you male and a female; and we have made you into nations and tribes so that you may know one another."

The Talmud tells us: "The whole of the Torah is for the purpose of promoting peace."

The Holy Bible tells us, "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God."

The people of the world can live together in peace. We know that is God's vision. Now, that must be our work here on Earth. Thank you. And may God's peace be upon you.


Trackback 0 Comment 0
2009/01/28 17:29

오바마 취임 연설(원문)

My fellow citizens:
    I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for
 the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our
 ancestors. I thank President Bush for his service to our nation, as
 well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this
 transition.
    Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath. The
 words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the
 still waters of peace. Yet, every so often the oath is taken amidst
 gathering clouds andraging storms. At these moments, America has
 carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in
 high office, but because we the people have remained faithful to the
 ideals of our forebears, and true to our founding documents.
    So it has been. So it must be with this generation of Americans.
    That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood. Our
 nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and
 hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and
 irresponsibility on the part of some, but also our collective
 failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age.
 Homes have been lost; jobs shed; businesses shuttered. Our health
 care is too costly; our schools fail too many; and each day brings
 further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our
 adversaries and threaten our planet.
    These are the indicators of crisis, subject to data and
 statistics. Less measurable but no less profound is a sapping of
 confidence across our land _ a nagging fear that America's decline
 is inevitable, and that the next generation must lower its sights.
    Today I say to you that the challenges we face are real. They are
 serious and they are many. They will not be met easily or in a short
 span of time. But know this, America _ they will be met.
    On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear,
 unity of purpose over conflict and discord.
    On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances
 and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas, that for
 far too long have strangled our politics.
    We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture, the time
 has come to set aside childish things. The time has come to reaffirm
 our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward
 that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to
 generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free
 and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness.In reaffirming the greatness of our nation, we understand that
 greatness is never a given. It must be earned. Our journey has never
 been one of shortcuts or settling for less. It has not been the path
 for the faint-hearted _ for those who prefer leisure over work, or
 seek only the pleasures of riches and fame. Rather, it has been the
 risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things _ some celebrated but
 more often men and women obscure in their labor, who have carried us
 up the long, rugged path towards prosperity and freedom.
    For us, they packed up their few worldly possessions and traveled
 across oceans in search of a new life.
    For us, they toiled in sweatshops and settled the West; endured
 the lash of the whip and plowed the hard earth.
    For us, they fought and died, in places like Concord and
 Gettysburg; Normandy and Khe Sanh.
    Time and again these men and women struggled and sacrificed and
 worked till their hands were raw so that we might live a better
 life. They saw Americaas bigger than the sum of our individual
 ambitions; greater than all the differences of birth or wealth or
 faction.
    This is the journey we continue today. We remain the most
 prosperous, powerful nation on Earth. Our workers are no less
 productive than when this crisis began. Our minds are no less
 inventive, our goods and services no less needed than they were last
 week or last month or last year. Our capacity remains undiminished.
 But our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and
 putting off unpleasant decisions _ that time has surely passed.
 Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and
 begin again the work of remaking America.
    For everywhere we look, there is work to be done. The state of
 the economy calls for action, bold and swift, and we will act _ not
 only to create new jobs, but to lay a new foundation for growth. We
 will build the roads and bridges, the electric grids and digital
 lines that feed our commerce and bind us together. We willrestore
 science to its rightful place, and wield technology's wonders to
 raise health care's quality and lower its cost. We will harness the
 sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our
 factories. And we will transform our schools and colleges and
 universities to meet the demands of a new age. All this we can do.
 All this we will do.
    Now, there are some who question the scale of our ambitions _ who
 suggest that our system cannot tolerate too many big plans. Their
 memories are short. For they have forgotten what this country has
 already done; what free men and women can achieve when imagination
 is joined to common purpose, and necessity to courage.
    What the cynics fail to understand is that the ground has shifted
 beneath them _ that the stale political arguments that have consumed
 us for so long no longer apply. The question we ask today is not
 whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works
 _ whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, caretheycan afford, a retirement that is dignified. Where the answer is yes,
 we intend to move forward. Where the answer is no, programs will
 end. Those of us who manage the public's dollars will be held to
 account _ to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in
 the light of day _ because only then can we restore the vital trust
 between a people and their government.
    Nor is the question before us whether the market is a force for
 good or ill. Its power to generate wealth and expand freedom is
 unmatched, but this crisis has reminded us that without a watchful
 eye, the market can spin out of control _ and that a nation cannot
 prosper long when it favors only the prosperous. The success of our
 economy has always depended not just on the size of our gross
 domestic product, but on the reach of our prosperity; on our ability
 to extend opportunity to every willing heart _ not out of charity,
 but because it is the surest route to our common good.
    As for our common defense, we rejectas false the choice between
 our safety and our ideals. Our founding fathers ... our founding
 fathers, faced with perils we can scarcely imagine, drafted a
 charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man, a charter
 expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the
 world, and we will not give them up for expedience's sake. And so to
 all the other peoples and governments who are watching today, from
 the grandest capitals to the small village where my father was born:
 know that America is a friend of each nation and every man, woman,
 and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity, and that we are
 ready to lead once more.
    Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism
 not just with missiles and tanks, but with sturdy alliances and
 enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot
 protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they
 knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security
 emanates from the justness ofour cause, the force of our example,
 the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.
    We are the keepers of this legacy. Guided by these principles
 once more, we can meet those new threats that demand even greater
 effort _ even greater cooperation and understanding between nations.
 We will begin to responsibly leave Iraq to its people, and forge a
 hard-earned peace in Afghanistan. With old friends and former foes,
 we will work tirelessly to lessen the nuclear threat, and roll back
 the specter of a warming planet. We will not apologize for our way
 of life, nor will we waver in its defense, and for those who seek to
 advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we
 say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken; you
 cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you.
    For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a
 weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus
 _ and non-believers. We are shaped by every language and culture,drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the
 bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that
 dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe
 that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe
 shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common
 humanity shall reveal itself; and that America must play its role in
 ushering in a new era of peace.
    To the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual
 interest and mutual respect. To those leaders around the globe who
 seek to sow conflict, or blame their society's ills on the West _
 know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what
 you destroy. To those who cling to power through corruption and
 deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong
 side of history; but that we will extend a hand if you are willing
 to unclench your fist.
    To the people of poor nations, we pledge to work alongside you to
 make your farmsflourish and let clean waters flow; to nourish
 starved bodies and feed hungry minds. And to those nations like ours
 that enjoy relative plenty, we say we can no longer afford
 indifference to the suffering outside our borders; nor can we
 consume the world's resources without regard to effect. For the
 world has changed, and we must change with it.
    As we consider the road that unfolds before us, we remember with
 humble gratitude those brave Americans who, at this very hour,
 patrol far-off deserts and distant mountains. They have something to
 tell us, just as the fallen heroes who lie in Arlington whisper
 through the ages. We honor them not only because they are guardians
 of our liberty, but because they embody the spirit of service; a
 willingness to find meaning in something greater than themselves.
 And yet, at this moment _ a moment that will define a generation _
 it is precisely this spirit that must inhabit us all.
    For as much as government can do and must do, it is ultimatelythe faithand determination of the American people upon which this
 nation relies. It is the kindness to take in a stranger when the
 levees break, the selflessness of workers who would rather cut their
 hours than see a friend lose their job which sees us through our
 darkest hours. It is the firefighter's courage to storm a stairway
 filled with smoke, but also a parent's willingness to nurture a
 child, that finally decides our fate.
    Our challenges may be new. The instruments with which we meet
 them may be new. But those values upon which our success depends _
 hard work and honesty, courage and fair play, tolerance and
 curiosity, loyalty and patriotism _ these things are old. These
 things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress
 throughout our history. What is demanded then is a return to these
 truths. What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility _
 a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to
 ourselves, our nation, and the world, duties that wedo not
 grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge
 that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of
 our character, than giving our all to a difficult task.
    This is the price and the promise of citizenship.
    This is the source of our confidence _ the knowledge that God
 calls on us to shape an uncertain destiny.
    This is the meaning of our liberty and our creed _ why men and
 women and children of every race and every faith can join in
 celebration across this magnificent Mall, and why a man whose father
 less than sixty years ago might not have been served at a local
 restaurant can now stand before you to take a most sacred oath.
    So let us mark this day with remembrance, of who we are and how
 far we have traveled. In the year of America's birth, in the coldest
 of months, a small band of patriots huddled by dying campfires on
 the shores of an icy river. The capital was abandoned. The enemy was
 advancing. The snow was stained with blood. At a moment when theoutcome of our revolution was most in doubt, the father of our
 nation ordered these words be read to the people:
    ``Let it be told to the future world ... that in the depth of
 winter, when nothing but hope and virtue could survive...that the
 city and the country, alarmed at one common danger, came forth to
 meet (it).''
    America, in the face of our common dangers, in this winter of our
 hardship, let us remember these timeless words. With hope and
 virtue, let us brave once more the icy currents, and endure what
 storms may come. Let it be said by our children's children that when
 we were tested we refused to let this journey end, that we did not
 turn back nor did we falter; and with eyes fixed on the horizon and
 God's grace upon us, we carried forth that great gift of freedom and
 delivered it safely to future generations.
    Thank you. God bless you. And God bless the United States of
 America.
Trackback 0 Comment 3
2007/11/06 23:35

이명박은 피하고,정동영은 기다리고

오늘(6일) 한나라당 이명박 후보와 대통합민주신당 정동영 후보가 만났습니다.처음은 아닙니다.

지난달 18일 한 신문사가 주최하는 행사에서 두 후보 모두 연설을 했고 그 과정에서 잠깐 ‘어색한 만남’을 가진 바 있습니다.

당시 이 후보측에서 “정 후보와 마주치지 않게 해달라.”고 주최측에 요청했다고 합니다.

이를 두고 여의도에서는 여러 해석이 나왔습니다.우선 지지율면에서 이 후보가  2∼3배 높게 나오는 상황에서 이 후보측 표현대로 ‘체급’이 안 맞는 후보와 한 자리에 있는 게 싫어서가 아니겠냐는 겁니다.며칠 후인 22일 “바둑 9급짜리 세 명이 모여 힘을 합쳐도 절대 1급이 될 수 없다.”고 말한 것을 보면 당시 이 후보의 태도가 설명이 됩니다.

또 하나의 이유로는 외모가 꼽혔습니다.만나면 반드시 악수를 하게 되고 당연히 사진이 신문에 실리고 화면이 방송 뉴스에 나갈 수 밖에 없습니다.같은 프레임에 두 후보 얼굴이 나갈 때 누구에게 불리(?)할지는 굳이 언급하지 않겠습니다.흠흠.(뭐 정 후보도 제 타입은 아닙니다. <-이렇게 말하면 이 후보가 덜 기분 나빠할까요? ㅋㅋ)

그럼에도 두 후보는 오고가는 동안 약 10초(?)간 마주쳤습니다.이 후보가 먼저 연설 마치고 행사장을 빠져나올 때쯤 정 후보가 다음 연설을 위해 로비에서 기다리고 있었던 것입니다.
사용자 삽입 이미지

지난달 18일 각 당 후보로 확정된 후 처음으로 공식석상에서 조우한 이명박,정동영 후보.

한쪽은 피하고 다른 한쪽은 만나려는 노력은 오늘도 이어졌습니다.
각 당에서 보내온 후보 일정마다 ‘선택 2007,한농연 주최 대선주차 초청토론회'가 포함돼 있었습니다.이 후보가 사실상 대부분의 합동 토론회를 거부하고 있는 상황에서  5명의 후보가 총출동하는 토론회에 이 후보가 나간다? 의문은 구체적인 행사 진행표를 받아보고 풀렸습니다.이름은 토론회이지만 사실상 후보들은 20분짜리 연설만 하고 각 당 정책위의장들이 토론을 하는 것이었죠.

또다른 의문이 생겼습니다.당에서 보내온 후보들 일정만 보면  이인제 후보는 1시40분,정동영·문국현·권영길 후보는 2시,이명박 후보는 3시 30분에 참석하기로 돼 있습니다.이인제 후보의 경우는 행사 시작 전 넉넉히 시간을 남기고 도착하겠다는 의미로 받아들일 수 있지만 이명박 후보는 혼자 늦게 간다?이해가 안갔습니다.나중에 얘기를 들어보니 인터뷰가 예정돼 있었다고 합니다.

하지만 여의도에서는 정 후보가 오후 3시에 대통합민주신당 의원 워크숍에 참여하기로 돼 있기 때문에 정 후보와의 만남을 피하기 위해 이 후보가 연설 시간을 최대한 늦춘 것 아니냐는 추측이 더 설득력을 얻었습니다.

피하려는 이 후보도 웃기지만 악착같이 만나려는 정 후보도 참,딱합니다.자신감의 표현일 수도 있고 선두를 따라잡아야하는 자의 도전 정신일 수 있겠죠.정 후보는 예정 시간 보다 늦은 3시쯤 도착했고 그러고도 30분쯤 VIP룸에서 머물렀습니다.이에 대한 해석은 두 가지입니다.‘이 후보를 만나기 위해서’‘이 후보 연설을 들은 뒤 거기에 맞불을 놓는 연설을 하기 위해서’

이 후보는 예정된 3시 30분을 훨씬 넘겨 4시 15분쯤 나타났습니다.인터뷰가 늦어졌다고 했지만 나중에 들어보니 인터뷰는 일찍 끝났다고 합니다.이에 대한 해석도 두 가지 입니다.'정 후보를 만나지 않기 위해서''정 후보가 자기 연설에 맞불 놓는 일 없도록 나중에 연설을 하기 위해서'

결국 두 사람은 무대 위에서 (특별한 발언은 없이) 악수를 나눴습니다.기다리는 자 앞에 장사 있겠습니까.^^

하지만 연설은 이 후보가 나중에 했습니다.(1승 1패?)
사용자 삽입 이미지

끝내는 무대에서 만나고야 만 두 후보.쫓는 자와 쫓기는 자,카메라 앞에서는 두 사람 모두 웃더군요.

연설 순서가 이렇게 된 이유는 정 후보가 연설을 마친 뒤 근처에서 열리고 있던 당 의원 워크숍에서 한 연설에서 밝혀집니다.(당초 워크숍 시작할 때 연설을 하기로 돼 있었습니다.지각쟁이 ㅡㅡ;;)

“농민대회 다녀오느라 늦었습니다.이명박 후보가 어찌나 공격적이던지,제가 뒤에 했으면 좀 받아쳤을 텐데 순서가 원내 일당이라 제가 먼저 연설을 했습니다.”

현재 이 후보는 중앙선관위가 주최하는 토론회에 참석할 때를 제외하고 다른 후보와 함께 토론하지 않겠다는 입장을 갖고 있습니다.이 후보를 따라잡아야하는 정 후보는 계속 ‘맞짱 토론’을 요구하겠지요.피하는 자와,만나려는 자의 숨바꼭질은 당분간 계속되지 않을까 싶습니다.






사용자 삽입 이미지

이올린에 북마크하기(0) 이올린에 추천하기(0)
Trackback 3 Comment 6
2007/11/05 15:19

정동영,삼성 사태 오락가락?

어제(4일) 저녁 7시 5분쯤 대통합민주신당 관계자로부터 전화 한통을 받았습니다.

뭔가 얘기를 하는데 잠시 알아 듣기가 어려웠습니다.

"미리 배포한 연설문에 삼성 특검 내용과 이회창 전 총재 관련된 부분이 있는데 실제 연설에서는 빠졌다.하지만 연설 한 것으로 쓰셔도 무방하다."

행사가 마감에 임박해서 열리는 경우 연설문 등 이미 내용이 확정된 것들은 미리 배포하는 경우가 종종 있습니다.하지만 기자회견이 아닌 연설의 경우 후보가 분위기에 따라 현장에서 가감을 하는 경우가 있습니다.특히 민감한 내용은 후보가 편집하는 경우가 종종 있습니다.

사용자 삽입 이미지

4일 가족행복위를 출범 시키고 있는 정동영 후보.

그래서 나중에 당이나 캠프에서 "읽지 않은 부분은 꼭 빼달라."는 얘기를 하곤합니다.

하지만 이번처럼 읽지 않은 것도 읽은 것으로 해달라는 건 처음입니다.그래서 처음에 상대방이 하는 말을 알아듣지 못했던 겁니다.여기에 이날 저는 간만에 일요일에 출근하지 않고 쉬고 있어서 미리 배포한 연설문을 보지 못한 상태였습니다.나중에 메일을 열어 보니 연설문과 실제 연설이 상당한 차이가 있더군요.

연설 전 기자들에게 배포된 연설문은 다음과 같습니다.

부패한 이명박, 이회창의 썩은 냄새도 모자라 요즘 삼성 비자금, 김석원 비자금, 대학 부정 편입학 등 부패가 온 나라에 진동하고 있습니다. 2002년 대선 때 “차떼기당” 한나라당에 수백억 원의 비자금을 제공한 삼성은 그후에도 추악한 손을 씻지 못하고 2004년 총선 이후에도 비자금을 조성하고 이를 각계 요로에 뿌렸다는 사실이 절망스럽습니다. 사회정의 구현과 경제민주화를 위해 헌신하고 있는 ‘정의구현사제단’에 경의를 표합니다. 검찰이 연루되어 검찰 수사가 어렵다면 ‘특별검사제’를 도입해서라도 ‘삼성비자금 사건’을 철저하게 수사해야 합니다.

특히 제가 개탄스럽게 생각하는 것은 지난 2005년에 삼성이 “반부패투명사회협약”을 체결했음에도 불구하고 여전히 비자금을 조성하여 사용하였다는 의혹이 일고 있는 점입니다. 여러분들이 잘 알다시피 2005년 3월 9일에 삼성, LG, SK, 현대자동차 등 국내 주요 그룹은 부정부패와 정경유착의 고리를 끊고 투명 경영을 확립하기 위해 “반부패투명사회협약”을 체결했습니다. 그 협약을 계기로 어두웠던 과거와 단절하고 깨끗한 사회, 투명한 국가로 나아가기로 했습니다. 그날 재계는 과거의 잘못을 반성하는 한편 앞으로 정경유착, 불법회계, 부정행위 등을 하지 않기로 결의했습니다. 그 전인 2005년 2월 1일에 전국경제인연합회는 “불법 정치자금을 주지 않겠다”고 발표하기도 했습니다. 결국 삼성은 국민을 우롱한 것입니다.

저는 우리 사회의 글로벌 스탠더드는 투명성이라고 생각합니다. 사회는 더 깨끗해져야 하고 정치도 선진국 기준이 되어야 합니다. 비자금을 조성하여 뒷거래를 하고 부정한 방법으로 기업 경영을 하는 삼성이 과연 글로벌 스탠더드인가 하고 저는 묻고 싶습니다. 이 기회에 삼성은 과거의 모든 잘못을 전부 고백하고 국민에게 용서를 구해야 할 것입니다. 과거의 모든 부정, 불법과 잘못된 관행을 용기 있게 고백하고 진정으로 국민의 사랑을 받는 국민 기업으로 다시 태어나야 할 것입니다.


 삼성에 대한 강도 높은 비판은 물론 특검이라는 카드까지 꺼내든 것입니다.모든 권력이 삼성 앞에서는 숨을 죽입니다.그럼에도 삼성에 맞서는 이런 발언을 준비했습니다.

하지만 이 연설문은 현장에서 이렇게 바뀌었습니다.

그런데 이명박 후보가 또 이회창후보가 정권을 잡게 되면 그 자체만으로 대한민국은 43등에서 대한민국의 국가 청렴도,국가투명도가 후퇴하리라 생각합니다.때 맞춰 삼성.밖에 나가면 글로벌 대기업인데 삼성 비자금,쌍용 비자금,유명사립대학교의 편입학 부정 사건.여기 발 맞춰 과거 거대야당이 누가 더 부패한 정치세력인가 놓고 경쟁하는 12월 대선 판이 펼쳐지고 있습니다.
글로벌 스탠더드.바로 대한민국의 글로벌 스탠더드를 올리는 것은 12월 승리 밖에 없습니다.지면 대한민국은 또 10년 전 그 상황으로 후퇴하게 됩니다.그래서 저는 선대위 산하에 이번 대선을 부패세력 대 국가청렴도 개선 위한 미래세력의 대결로 대한민국 클린 선대위 구성하고 클린위가 다섯가지 정책으로 만들어서 국민 앞에 내놓겠습니다.

후보와 연설문 작성자간의 조율이 안되는 경우가 있습니다.특히 후보 스타일에 따라 연설문과 상관없이 연설을 하는 경우도 많습니다.하지만 이런 문제를 후보자와 상의 없이 연설문에 담지는 않았을겁니다.

후보 본인 판단에 따라 즉석에서 내용을 뺀 것도 탐탁지 않습니다.그런데 하지도 않은 얘기를 하지만 나중에 도로 넣어달라는 건 무슨 조화인지,삼성에 대한 정 후보의 태도가 설마 '오락가락' 했던 건지 궁금해집니다.







사용자 삽입 이미지


이올린에 북마크하기(0) 이올린에 추천하기(0)
Trackback 0 Comment 12